Judiciary

"It is a question of public perception and public
confidence, trust, faith and in that light it is a step in the
right direction," Singhvi said.

Prasad said the "welcome" gesture shown by the
judiciary should be appreciated. "I am afraid that this
decision could have been taken earlier and the unfortunate
controversy over the last couple of months could have been
avoided."

He also said he has a "humble request" to make to "my
lords" -- "please don't speak in public, don't write articles,
including the retired judges. That restraint is equally
important."

Former Attorney General and constitutional expert Soli
Sorabjee said "it is a very good decision taken by judges".

"I think it is a very good development. It's better
late than never," Sorabjee said adding the judges have heeded
to the views of former Chief Justices and senior advocates who
were also very keen to maintain the image of the judiciary.

"I am sure their initial reluctance not to declare
assets was not because they had anything to hide. They had
misgivings that it may be misused," he said.

"The whole controversy had become very unsavoury with
this kind of suggestions that judges have something to hide --
they want to be above the law. I am so happy that the Supreme
Court has risen to the occasion," senior lawyer Harish Salve
said. (More) PTI