ID :
64679
Mon, 06/08/2009 - 10:42
Auther :
Shortlink :
https://oananews.org//node/64679
The shortlink copeid
EDITORIAL from the JoongAng Daily on June 8)
Curbing energy consumption
The government has announced a string of measures to cope with the renewed surge
in oil prices. This is significant in two ways.
First, the government???s action reignites public awareness to the need for
energy-efficiency and comes just as global oil prices, which had plummeted to $30
per barrel, have bounced back to over $60 per barrel. The Korean economy, driven
primarily by fuel-based factory production, will see a current account deficit if
the price goes over $90. The government was right to take preemptive action
against a further hike in oil prices.
Second, the government???s latest measures signify a change in energy policy,
with its priorities having shifted from supply to demand. Until now, energy
policy has been designed to reign in fuel prices through a stable supply system.
The government refrained from raising electricity and gas fees regardless of
increases in global oil prices and kept industrial energy rates at below market
prices to help stabilize consumer prices as well as help these industries retain
their competitive edge.
But this kind of government relief has spoiled the Korean economy, transforming
our industries into voracious consumers of energy.
When producing the same value-added output, Korea consumes 1.3 times to 1.6 times
more energy than Japan, Germany and the United States because of its liberal use
of energy and natural gas.
Electricity fees are 60 percent to 70 percent of what they are in Japan while
household natural gas prices are just one-third of Japan???s. No rallying cries
for energy conservation at home and industrial sites will be of use under this
kind of price structure.
We agree that the government needs to raise electricity and gas prices to a
certain level and support the idea of linking them to global oil and fuel prices.
The government must redress its energy policy to create a more energy-efficient
economy.
One concern about the plan is its effect on inflation and households in the
current economic environment.
If the government tries to reflect global price hikes in public energy fees, the
shock to the economy will be too great. It needs to be careful and increase
prices gradually. At the same time, it must keep a watchful eye on operations at
state energy monopolies Korea Electric Power Corp. and Korea Gas Corp.
They need to be encouraged to continue with their restructuring plans so that
management abuses cannot take place in the aftermath of higher fuel charges.
(END)